Version 145 (modified by mark, 13 years ago) ( diff )

--

Masterthesis: Opponent Models in Bilateral Negotiation

by Mark Hendrikx.

Literature Survey

The newst version can be found on the SVN repository

Main Research Questions

  • How to measure the quality of opponent models?
  • Are agents using opponent models "better" than other agents?
  • How do opponent models compare regarding accuracy, convergence, and computational cost?
  • How to create an opponent model which is better than the state-of-the-art?

Meeting

Meeting agendas and minutes

Planning

The datas in the overview below refer to deadlines.

  • Validated all decoupled agents (13-01-12)
  • Study for exam (15-01-12 -> 03-02-12)
  • Quantified the benefits of using a perfect model (07-02-12)
  • Finished editing OM paper (15-02-12)
    • Abstract / Introduction (08-01-12)
    • Preliminaries (09-01-12)
    • OM in automated negotiation (10-01-12)
    • OM Framework (11-01-12)
    • Learning of OM (07-02-12)
    • Use of OM (09-02-12)
    • Evaluating OM (10-02-12)
    • OM in ANAC (11-02-12)
    • Quality of OM in ANAC (13-02-12)
    • Conclusion (15-02-12)
  • First version of short paper ACAN (15-02-12)
  • Compare accuracy, convergence, and computational cost of existing models (11-03-12)
    • Implement measurement methods
    • Create testsetup
    • Analyze data
  • Finished ANAC2012 agent (18-03-12)
  • Create a model which is beter than the state of the art
    • Improve frequency model by dynamic learning rate
    • Improve Bayesian model by improving decision function assumption
  • Draft of masterthesis (10/06/12)
  • Finish masterthesis (10/07/12)

Attachments (3)

Download all attachments as: .zip

Note: See TracWiki for help on using the wiki.