Version 144 (modified by 13 years ago) ( diff ) | ,
---|
Masterthesis: Opponent Models in Bilateral Negotiation
by Mark Hendrikx.
Literature Survey
The newst version can be found on the SVN repository
Main Research Questions
- How to measure the quality of opponent models?
- Are agents using opponent models "better" than other agents?
- How do opponent models compare regarding accuracy, convergence, and computational cost?
- How to create an opponent model which is better than the state-of-the-art?
Meeting
Planning
The datas in the overview below refer to deadlines.
- Validated all decoupled agents (13-01-12)
- Study for exam (15-01-12 - 03-02-12)
- Quantified the benefits of using a perfect model (07-02-12)
- Finished editing OM paper (15-02-12)
- Abstract / Introduction (08-01-12)
- Preliminaries (09-01-12)
- OM in automated negotiation (10-01-12)
- OM Framework (11-01-12)
- Learning of OM (07-02-12)
- Use of OM (09-02-12)
- Evaluating OM (10-02-12)
- OM in ANAC (11-02-12)
- Quality of OM in ANAC (13-02-12)
- Conclusion (15-02-12)
- First version of short paper ACAN (15-02-12)
- Compare accuracy, convergence, and computational cost of existing models (11-03-12)
- Implement measurement methods
- Create testsetup
- Analyze data
- Finished ANAC2012 agent (18-03-12)
- Create a model which is beter than the state of the art
- Improve frequency model by dynamic learning rate
- Improve Bayesian model by improving decision function assumption
- Draft of masterthesis (10/06/12)
- Finish masterthesis (10/07/12)
Attachments (3)
- OM_lit.bib (25.4 KB ) - added by 13 years ago.
- OM_lit.2.bib (25.3 KB ) - added by 13 years ago.
- OM_lit.3.bib (25.0 KB ) - added by 13 years ago.
Download all attachments as: .zip
Note:
See TracWiki
for help on using the wiki.