1 | package onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.players;
|
---|
2 |
|
---|
3 | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
|
---|
4 |
|
---|
5 | import java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue;
|
---|
6 |
|
---|
7 | import genius.core.protocol.MultilateralProtocol;
|
---|
8 | import onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.Bundle;
|
---|
9 | import onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.OutcomeSpace;
|
---|
10 | import onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.interactions.Accept;
|
---|
11 | import onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.interactions.Offer;
|
---|
12 | import onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.players.utilityfunction.UtilityFunction;
|
---|
13 |
|
---|
14 | /**
|
---|
15 | * Boulware/Conceder tactics, by Tim Baarslag, adapted from [1]. Adapted by Mark
|
---|
16 | * Hendrikx to use the SortedOutcomeSpace instead of BidHistory. Adapted by
|
---|
17 | * David Festen for multilateral case.
|
---|
18 | *
|
---|
19 | * [1] S. Shaheen Fatima Michael Wooldridge Nicholas R. Jennings Optimal
|
---|
20 | * Negotiation Strategies for Agents with Incomplete Information
|
---|
21 | * http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/6151/1/atal01.pdf
|
---|
22 | *
|
---|
23 | * @author Tim Baarslag, Mark Hendrikx
|
---|
24 | */
|
---|
25 | public abstract class AbstractTimeDependentNegotiationParty extends Agent
|
---|
26 | {
|
---|
27 |
|
---|
28 | OutcomeSpace outcomeSpace;
|
---|
29 | Bundle lastReceivedBid = null;
|
---|
30 |
|
---|
31 | public AbstractTimeDependentNegotiationParty(String name, UtilityFunction u,
|
---|
32 | BlockingQueue<onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.interactions.Offer> in,
|
---|
33 | BlockingQueue<onetomany.bargainingchipsgame.interactions.Offer> out,
|
---|
34 | BlockingQueue<CoordinationMessage> cin,
|
---|
35 | BlockingQueue<NegotiationStatusMessage> cout) {
|
---|
36 | super(name, u, in, out, cin, cout);
|
---|
37 | outcomeSpace = new OutcomeSpace(null);
|
---|
38 | }
|
---|
39 |
|
---|
40 | /**
|
---|
41 | * When this class is called, it is expected that the Party chooses one of
|
---|
42 | * the actions from the possible action list and returns an instance of the
|
---|
43 | * chosen action. This class is only called if this
|
---|
44 | * {@link genius.core.parties.NegotiationParty} is in the
|
---|
45 | * {@link MultilateralProtocol#getRoundStructure(java.util.List, negotiator.session.Session)}
|
---|
46 | * .
|
---|
47 | *
|
---|
48 | * @param possibleActions
|
---|
49 | * List of all actions possible.
|
---|
50 | * @return The chosen action
|
---|
51 | */
|
---|
52 | @Override
|
---|
53 | protected Offer sendOffer()
|
---|
54 | {
|
---|
55 | Bundle nextBid = getNextBid();
|
---|
56 |
|
---|
57 | double lastUtil = lastReceivedBid != null ? u.getUtility(lastReceivedBid) : 0;
|
---|
58 | double nextUtil = nextBid != null ? u.getUtility(nextBid) : 0;
|
---|
59 |
|
---|
60 | // Accept
|
---|
61 | if (nextUtil < lastUtil)
|
---|
62 | return new Accept();
|
---|
63 | // Counter offer based actions
|
---|
64 | else
|
---|
65 | return new Offer(nextBid);
|
---|
66 | }
|
---|
67 |
|
---|
68 | /**
|
---|
69 | * Get the next bid we should do
|
---|
70 | */
|
---|
71 | protected Bundle getNextBid()
|
---|
72 | {
|
---|
73 | return outcomeSpace.getBidNearUtility(getTargetUtility(), u);
|
---|
74 | }
|
---|
75 |
|
---|
76 | @Override
|
---|
77 | protected void receiveOffer(Offer o)
|
---|
78 | {
|
---|
79 | lastReceivedBid = o.getBundle();
|
---|
80 | }
|
---|
81 |
|
---|
82 | /**
|
---|
83 | * Gets the target utility for the next bid
|
---|
84 | *
|
---|
85 | * @return The target utility for the given time
|
---|
86 | */
|
---|
87 | public double getTargetUtility()
|
---|
88 | {
|
---|
89 | // timeline runs from 0.0 to 1.0
|
---|
90 |
|
---|
91 | // we have a slight offset because discrete timeline is 1-based, this
|
---|
92 | // needs to be addressed
|
---|
93 | int totalrounds = 20;
|
---|
94 | double offset = 1d / totalrounds;
|
---|
95 | double time = k / (totalrounds + 1);
|
---|
96 | double target = 1d - f(time - offset);
|
---|
97 | System.out.println("Target util: " + target);
|
---|
98 | return target;
|
---|
99 | }
|
---|
100 |
|
---|
101 | /**
|
---|
102 | * From [1]:
|
---|
103 | *
|
---|
104 | * A wide range of time dependent functions can be defined by varying the
|
---|
105 | * way in which f(t) is computed. However, functions must ensure that 0 <=
|
---|
106 | * f(t) <= 1, f(0) = k, and f(1) = 1.
|
---|
107 | *
|
---|
108 | * That is, the offer will always be between the value range, at the
|
---|
109 | * beginning it will give the initial constant and when the deadline is
|
---|
110 | * reached, it will offer the reservation value.
|
---|
111 | *
|
---|
112 | * For e = 0 (special case), it will behave as a Hardliner.
|
---|
113 | */
|
---|
114 | public double f(double t) {
|
---|
115 | if (getE() == 0) {
|
---|
116 | return 0;
|
---|
117 | }
|
---|
118 | return pow(t, 1 / getE());
|
---|
119 | }
|
---|
120 |
|
---|
121 | /**
|
---|
122 | * Depending on the value of e, extreme sets show clearly different patterns
|
---|
123 | * of behaviour [1]:
|
---|
124 | *
|
---|
125 | * 1. Boulware: For this strategy e < 1 and the initial offer is maintained
|
---|
126 | * till time is almost exhausted, when the agent concedes up to its
|
---|
127 | * reservation value.
|
---|
128 | *
|
---|
129 | * 2. Conceder: For this strategy e > 1 and the agent goes to its
|
---|
130 | * reservation value very quickly.
|
---|
131 | *
|
---|
132 | * 3. When e = 1, the price is increased linearly.
|
---|
133 | *
|
---|
134 | * 4. When e = 0, the agent plays hardball.
|
---|
135 | */
|
---|
136 | public abstract double getE();
|
---|
137 |
|
---|
138 | @Override
|
---|
139 | protected Offer sendOpeningOffer() {
|
---|
140 | // TODO Auto-generated method stub
|
---|
141 | return null;
|
---|
142 | }
|
---|
143 |
|
---|
144 | @Override
|
---|
145 | protected void receiveCoordinationMessage(CoordinationMessage cpoll)
|
---|
146 | {
|
---|
147 | // TODO Auto-generated method stub
|
---|
148 | }
|
---|
149 | }
|
---|