[127] | 1 | package negotiator.parties;
|
---|
| 2 |
|
---|
| 3 | import static java.lang.Math.pow;
|
---|
| 4 |
|
---|
| 5 | import java.util.List;
|
---|
| 6 |
|
---|
| 7 | import genius.core.AgentID;
|
---|
| 8 | import genius.core.Bid;
|
---|
| 9 | import genius.core.actions.Accept;
|
---|
| 10 | import genius.core.actions.Action;
|
---|
| 11 | import genius.core.actions.NoAction;
|
---|
| 12 | import genius.core.actions.Offer;
|
---|
| 13 | import genius.core.actions.OfferForVoting;
|
---|
| 14 | import genius.core.actions.Reject;
|
---|
| 15 | import genius.core.boaframework.SortedOutcomeSpace;
|
---|
| 16 | import genius.core.parties.AbstractNegotiationParty;
|
---|
| 17 | import genius.core.parties.NegotiationInfo;
|
---|
| 18 | import genius.core.protocol.MultilateralProtocol;
|
---|
| 19 | import genius.core.timeline.DiscreteTimeline;
|
---|
| 20 |
|
---|
| 21 | /**
|
---|
| 22 | * Boulware/Conceder tactics, by Tim Baarslag, adapted from [1]. Adapted by Mark
|
---|
| 23 | * Hendrikx to use the SortedOutcomeSpace instead of BidHistory. Adapted by
|
---|
| 24 | * David Festen for multilateral case.
|
---|
| 25 | *
|
---|
| 26 | * [1] S. Shaheen Fatima Michael Wooldridge Nicholas R. Jennings Optimal
|
---|
| 27 | * Negotiation Strategies for Agents with Incomplete Information
|
---|
| 28 | * http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/6151/1/atal01.pdf
|
---|
| 29 | *
|
---|
| 30 | * @author Tim Baarslag, Mark Hendrikx
|
---|
| 31 | */
|
---|
| 32 | public abstract class AbstractTimeDependentNegotiationParty extends AbstractNegotiationParty
|
---|
| 33 | {
|
---|
| 34 | SortedOutcomeSpace outcomeSpace;
|
---|
| 35 | Bid lastReceivedBid = null;
|
---|
| 36 |
|
---|
| 37 | @Override
|
---|
| 38 | public void init(NegotiationInfo info)
|
---|
| 39 | {
|
---|
| 40 | super.init(info);
|
---|
| 41 | outcomeSpace = new SortedOutcomeSpace(getUtilitySpace());
|
---|
| 42 | }
|
---|
| 43 |
|
---|
| 44 | /**
|
---|
| 45 | * When this class is called, it is expected that the Party chooses one of
|
---|
| 46 | * the actions from the possible action list and returns an instance of the
|
---|
| 47 | * chosen action. This class is only called if this
|
---|
| 48 | * {@link genius.core.parties.NegotiationParty} is in the
|
---|
| 49 | * {@link MultilateralProtocol#getRoundStructure(java.util.List, negotiator.session.Session)}
|
---|
| 50 | * .
|
---|
| 51 | *
|
---|
| 52 | * @param possibleActions
|
---|
| 53 | * List of all actions possible.
|
---|
| 54 | * @return The chosen action
|
---|
| 55 | */
|
---|
| 56 | @Override
|
---|
| 57 | public Action chooseAction(List<Class<? extends Action>> possibleActions) {
|
---|
| 58 | Bid nextBid = getNextBid();
|
---|
| 59 | double lastUtil = lastReceivedBid != null ? utilitySpace.getUtilityWithDiscount(lastReceivedBid, timeline) : 0;
|
---|
| 60 | double nextUtil = nextBid != null ? utilitySpace.getUtilityWithDiscount(nextBid, timeline) : 0;
|
---|
| 61 |
|
---|
| 62 | // Accept is for both voting and counter offer protocols
|
---|
| 63 | if (possibleActions.contains(Accept.class) && nextUtil < lastUtil)
|
---|
| 64 | return new Accept(getPartyId(), lastReceivedBid);
|
---|
| 65 |
|
---|
| 66 | // Counter offer based actions
|
---|
| 67 | else if (possibleActions.contains(Offer.class))
|
---|
| 68 | return new Offer(getPartyId(), nextBid);
|
---|
| 69 |
|
---|
| 70 | // Voting based actions
|
---|
| 71 | else if (possibleActions.contains(OfferForVoting.class))
|
---|
| 72 | return new OfferForVoting(getPartyId(), nextBid);
|
---|
| 73 | else if (possibleActions.contains(Reject.class))
|
---|
| 74 | return new Reject(getPartyId(), lastReceivedBid); // Accept is higher up the chain
|
---|
| 75 | // default action
|
---|
| 76 | else
|
---|
| 77 | return new NoAction(getPartyId());
|
---|
| 78 | }
|
---|
| 79 |
|
---|
| 80 | /**
|
---|
| 81 | * Get the next bid we should do
|
---|
| 82 | */
|
---|
| 83 | protected Bid getNextBid() {
|
---|
| 84 | return outcomeSpace.getBidNearUtility(getTargetUtility()).getBid();
|
---|
| 85 | }
|
---|
| 86 |
|
---|
| 87 | /**
|
---|
| 88 | * This method is called when an observable action is performed. Observable
|
---|
| 89 | * actions are defined in
|
---|
| 90 | * {@link MultilateralProtocol#getActionListeners(java.util.List)}
|
---|
| 91 | *
|
---|
| 92 | * @param sender
|
---|
| 93 | * The initiator of the action
|
---|
| 94 | * @param arguments
|
---|
| 95 | * The action performed
|
---|
| 96 | */
|
---|
| 97 | @Override
|
---|
| 98 | public void receiveMessage(AgentID sender, Action arguments) {
|
---|
| 99 | if (arguments instanceof Offer)
|
---|
| 100 | lastReceivedBid = ((Offer) arguments).getBid();
|
---|
| 101 | }
|
---|
| 102 |
|
---|
| 103 | /**
|
---|
| 104 | * Gets the target utility for the next bid
|
---|
| 105 | *
|
---|
| 106 | * @return The target utility for the given time
|
---|
| 107 | */
|
---|
| 108 | public double getTargetUtility() {
|
---|
| 109 |
|
---|
| 110 | // timeline runs from 0.0 to 1.0
|
---|
| 111 |
|
---|
| 112 | // we have a slight offset because discrete timeline is 1-based, this
|
---|
| 113 | // needs to be addressed
|
---|
| 114 | double offset = timeline instanceof DiscreteTimeline ? 1d / ((DiscreteTimeline) timeline).getTotalRounds() : 0d;
|
---|
| 115 | double target = 1d - f(timeline.getTime() - offset);
|
---|
| 116 | // System.out.println("Target util: " + target);
|
---|
| 117 | return target;
|
---|
| 118 | }
|
---|
| 119 |
|
---|
| 120 | /**
|
---|
| 121 | * From [1]:
|
---|
| 122 | *
|
---|
| 123 | * A wide range of time dependent functions can be defined by varying the
|
---|
| 124 | * way in which f(t) is computed. However, functions must ensure that 0 <=
|
---|
| 125 | * f(t) <= 1, f(0) = k, and f(1) = 1.
|
---|
| 126 | *
|
---|
| 127 | * That is, the offer will always be between the value range, at the
|
---|
| 128 | * beginning it will give the initial constant and when the deadline is
|
---|
| 129 | * reached, it will offer the reservation value.
|
---|
| 130 | *
|
---|
| 131 | * For e = 0 (special case), it will behave as a Hardliner.
|
---|
| 132 | */
|
---|
| 133 | public double f(double t) {
|
---|
| 134 | if (getE() == 0) {
|
---|
| 135 | return 0;
|
---|
| 136 | }
|
---|
| 137 | return pow(t, 1 / getE());
|
---|
| 138 | }
|
---|
| 139 |
|
---|
| 140 | /**
|
---|
| 141 | * Depending on the value of e, extreme sets show clearly different patterns
|
---|
| 142 | * of behaviour [1]:
|
---|
| 143 | *
|
---|
| 144 | * 1. Boulware: For this strategy e < 1 and the initial offer is maintained
|
---|
| 145 | * till time is almost exhausted, when the agent concedes up to its
|
---|
| 146 | * reservation value.
|
---|
| 147 | *
|
---|
| 148 | * 2. Conceder: For this strategy e > 1 and the agent goes to its
|
---|
| 149 | * reservation value very quickly.
|
---|
| 150 | *
|
---|
| 151 | * 3. When e = 1, the price is increased linearly.
|
---|
| 152 | *
|
---|
| 153 | * 4. When e = 0, the agent plays hardball.
|
---|
| 154 | */
|
---|
| 155 | public abstract double getE();
|
---|
| 156 | }
|
---|