source: doc/userguide.bbl@ 256

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{MultilateralOffersProtocols}
Reyhan Aydogan, David Festen, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Alternating offers protocols for multilateral negotiation.
\newblock {\em Modern Approaches to Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation},
  2014.

\bibitem{MultiMediatedNegoProtocolsWithFeedback}
Reyhan Aydogan, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Multilateral mediated negotiation protocols with feedback.
\newblock In I.~Marsa-Maestre, M.~A. Lopez-Carmona, T.~Ito, M.~Zhang, Q.~Bai,
  and K.~Fujita, editors, {\em Novel Insights in Agent based Complex Automated
  Negotiation, Chapter: Multilateral Mediated Negotiation Protocols with
  Feedback}, chapter~3, pages 43--59. Springer, 2014.

\bibitem{Ayd14}
Reyhan Aydo\u{g}an, Tim Baarslag, Koen~V. Hindriks, Catholijn~M. Jonker, and
  P{\i}nar Yolum.
\newblock Heuristics for using cp-nets in utility-based negotiation without
  knowing utilities.
\newblock {\em Knowledge and Information Systems}, 45(2):357--388, November
  2015.

\bibitem{BaarslagComponentAnalysis}
Tim Baarslag, Alexander~S.Y. Dirkzwager, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M.
  Jonker.
\newblock The significance of bidding, accepting and opponent modeling in
  automated negotiation.
\newblock In {\em 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence}, volume
  263 of {\em Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications}, pages
  27--32. IOS Press, 2014.

\bibitem{Baarslag12AI}
Tim Baarslag, Mark~J.C. Hendrikx, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Measuring the performance of online opponent models in automated
  bilateral negotiation.
\newblock In Michael Thielscher and Dongmo Zhang, editors, {\em AI 2012:
  Advances in Artificial Intelligence}, volume 7691 of {\em Lecture Notes in
  Computer Science}, pages 1--14. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.

\bibitem{Baarslag13AIT}
Tim Baarslag, Mark~J.C. Hendrikx, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Predicting the performance of opponent models in automated
  negotiation.
\newblock In {\em Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint
  Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies
  (IAT)}, volume~2 of {\em WI-IAT '13}, pages 59--66, Washington, DC, USA, Nov
  2013. IEEE Computer Society.

\bibitem{Baarslag13AAMAS}
Tim Baarslag and Koen~V. Hindriks.
\newblock Accepting optimally in automated negotiation with incomplete
  information.
\newblock In {\em Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on
  Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems}, AAMAS '13, pages 715--722,
  Richland, SC, 2013. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and
  Multiagent Systems.

\bibitem{BaarslagBOA}
Tim Baarslag, Koen~V. Hindriks, Mark~J.C. Hendrikx, Alex~S.Y. Dirkzwager, and
  Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Decoupling negotiating agents to explore the space of negotiation
  strategies.
\newblock In Ivan Marsa-Maestre, Miguel~A. Lopez-Carmona, Takayuki Ito, Minjie
  Zhang, Quan Bai, and Katsuhide Fujita, editors, {\em Novel Insights in
  Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation}, volume 535 of {\em Studies in
  Computational Intelligence}, pages 61--83. Springer, Japan, 2014.

\bibitem{Baarslag13DSS}
Tim Baarslag, Koen~V. Hindriks, and Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Effective acceptance conditions in real-time automated negotiation.
\newblock {\em Decision Support Systems}, 60:68--77, Apr 2014.

\bibitem{BaarslagValueOfInformation}
Tim Baarslag and Michael Kaisers.
\newblock The value of information in automated negotiation: A decision model
  for eliciting user preferences.
\newblock In {\em Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and
  MultiAgent Systems}, AAMAS '17, pages 391--400, Richland, SC, 2017.
  International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

\bibitem{UTAGMS}
Salvatore Greco, Vincent Mousseau, and Roman Slowinski.
\newblock Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set
  of additive value functions.
\newblock {\em European Journal of Operational Research}, 191(2):416 -- 436,
  2008.

\bibitem{ANAC2010KawExt}
Shogo Kawaguchi, Katsuhide Fujita, and Takayuki Ito.
\newblock Compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for
  automated negotiating agents.
\newblock In Takayuki Ito, Minjie Zhang, Valentin Robu, Shaheen Fatima, and
  Tokuro Matsuo, editors, {\em New Trends in Agent-based Complex Automated
  Negotiations, Series of Studies in Computational Intelligence}, pages
  137--144, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. Springer-Verlag.

\bibitem{Genius}
Raz Lin, Sarit Kraus, Tim Baarslag, Dmytro Tykhonov, Koen~V. Hindriks, and
  Catholijn~M. Jonker.
\newblock Genius: An integrated environment for supporting the design of
  generic automated negotiators.
\newblock {\em Computational Intelligence}, 2012.

\bibitem{Ros16}
Ewa Roszkowska.
\newblock The application of uta method for support evaluation negotiation
  offers.
\newblock 2016.

\bibitem{Sri73}
Venkat Srinivasan and Allan~D Shocker.
\newblock Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite
  criterion using pairwise judgments.
\newblock {\em Psychometrika}, 38(4):473--493, 1973.

\bibitem{Tsi18}
Dimitrios Tsimpoukis, Tim Baarslag, Michael Kaisers, and Nikolaos Paterakis.
\newblock Automated negotiations under user preference uncertainty: A linear
  programming approach.
\newblock In {\em Proceedings of Agreement Technologies}, January 2018.

\bibitem{Zin18}
Luisa~M Zintgraf, Diederik~M Roijers, Sjoerd Linders, Catholijn~M Jonker, and
  Ann Now{\'e}.
\newblock Ordered preference elicitation strategies for supporting
  multi-objective decision making.
\newblock {\em arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07606}, 2018.

\end{thebibliography}